infowarswilton

OFFICAL STORY: “White, 30 somthing, domestic terrorist”

infowarswilton — Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:55:30 +0000

As the Mainstream Media continues to repeat the unfounded narrative of a “White, 30 something, lone gunman” Eyewitness accounts corroborate the account of multiple gunnman wearing “all black” wearing “tactical gear” and even reporting the use tear gas.

Was the Aurora, CO massacre a staged event?

infowarswilton — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:18:42 +0000

This Marine say yes.

EXCLUSIVE: INSIDE scoop on the Ron Paul Campaign sabotoge!!!!

infowarswilton — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:33:03 +0000

Shadows in the cave: The Osama Deception

infowarswilton — Wed, 09 May 2012 06:02:19 +0000

Reblogged from infowarswilton:

FOX NEWS REPORTS BIN LADEN DEAD IN 2002....?

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

Read more… 267 more words, 1 more video

Shadows in the cave: The Osama Deception

infowarswilton — Wed, 02 May 2012 00:55:48 +0000

FOX NEWS REPORTS BIN LADEN DEAD IN 2002….?

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

“The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead,” the source said.

Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December, in the vicinity of the Tora Bora mountains. The source claimed that bin Laden was laid to rest honorably in his last abode and his grave was made as per his Wahabi belief.

About 30 close associates of bin Laden in Al Qaeda, including his most trusted and personal bodyguards, his family members and some “Taliban friends,” attended the funeral rites. A volley of bullets was also fired to pay final tribute to the “great leader.”

The Taliban source who claims to have seen bin Laden’s face before burial said “he looked pale … but calm, relaxed and confident.”

Asked whether bin Laden had any feelings of remorse before death, the source vehemently said “no.” Instead, he said, bin Laden was proud that he succeeded in his mission of igniting awareness amongst Muslims about hegemonistic designs and conspiracies of “pagans” against Islam. Bin Laden, he said, held the view that the sacrifice of a few hundred people in Afghanistan was nothing, as those who laid their lives in creating an atmosphere of resistance will be adequately rewarded by Almighty Allah.

When asked where bin Laden was buried, the source said, “I am sure that like other places in Tora Bora, that particular place too must have vanished.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html#ixzz1tfcy5WVY

Michael Savage “Was Brietabrt Assinated”

infowarswilton — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:00:18 +0000

17 years later: Was The OKC bombing an Inside job?

infowarswilton — Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:04:01 +0000

100 years later: Did J.P. Morgan sink the Titantic?

infowarswilton — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 04:02:40 +0000

As youngsters, we’re all told the infamous story of the Titanic, the supposedly indestructible ship that sunk on its maiden voyage. We’re all familiar with the story: the ship left Southampton, England, headed for New York City on April 10, 1912. Four days into the voyage, at 11:40pm on April 14, 1912, the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank at 2:20am, “resulting in the deaths of 1,517 people in one of the deadliest peacetime maritime disasters in history [12].”

Bad luck, we’re all led to believe. No one saw the iceberg and so the infallible ship sank. Bummer…

But few of us ever think that through. Forget, for a moment, the story we’re all fed. Does it make sense? My point is that just because we’re told a story when we’re young, doesn’t mean we should simply accept it as absolute truth.

Let’s take a look at some of the facts surrounding the sinking of the Titanic:

1. J.P. Morgan owned White Star Line ships. J.P. Morgan was also the main conspirator behind the creation of the Federal reserve banking system. He was supposed to be on the ship but canceled at the last moment.

2. John Jacob Astor, along with Benjamin Guggenheim and Isa Strauss, were three very wealthy and powerful men, all of whom were vehemently against the creation of the Federal Reserve, and were quite outspoken on the matter. Morgan viewed Astor and Co. as a huge obstacle. These three men died when the Titanic — a ship built by J.P. Morgan’s White Star Line — hit that infamous iceberg and sank.

3. J.P. Morgan and John Jacob Astor both funded Nikola Tesla, who created a way to generate an infinite amount of electrical energy. Tesla planned to allow people to access that energy for free, but Morgan squashed Tesla because he wanted to profit from energy, not give it away. Astor, Tesla’s good friend, seemed to have deep pockets for Tesla. Not good for Morgan.

4. Once Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss were dead, there was no more public outcry against the Federal Reserve. It passed congress and was signed into law the following year on December 23, 1913. In addition, now Tesla’s funding was wiped away, his friend in Astor gone.

You must admit, all of this is extremely interesting. Could Morgan have created this plot to kill off his biggest opponents? Did Morgan “whack” Astor because he was getting in his way on too many wealth and power-generating projects?

Admittedly, there are some holes in this interesting theory. For example:

1. Why wouldn’t Morgan have simply had Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss shot? That certainly would have been easier than sinking an entire ship. Then again, then there would have been intense investigations into their murders. When multi-billionaires turn up dead, no stone is left unturned.

2. How could Morgan guarantee Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss would be on the ship? Maybe there were behind-the-scenes events, put in place by Morgan, to ensure those men would be on the ship. We’ll never know.

3. Moreover, how could Morgan be sure Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss would go down with the ship and not get off onto lifeboats? Maybe Morgan knew well of the truly high character of Astor: “Colonel Astor was another of the heroes of the awful night. Effort was made to persuade him to take a place in one of the life-boats, but he emphatically refused to do so until every woman and child on board had been provided for, not excepting the women members of the ship’s company [4].” Apparently, Guggenheim and Strauss did the same.

4. Why would J.P. Morgan have believed that unless Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss were killed, his coveted Federal Reserve Act wouldn’t have passed? It seems strange that these three men would have had the combined political power to diffuse Morgan & Co.’s clandestine plans.

However, even with the doubt these questions raise in this theory, one cannot help but look upon the story of the Titanic with suspicion.

Is it just a coincidence that J.P. Morgan owned White Star Line, the company that produced the supposedly unsinkable Titanic, and that it went down with his enemy, John Jacob Astor, as well as Federal Reserve opposers Guggenheim and Strauss?

And is it merely coincidence that Morgan and Astor both funded Nikola Tesla, whose innovations could have been either the greatest gifts to mankind or the greatest wealth generators for the few, depending upon who controlled them?

Could the Titanic have been the most ingenious assassination in history?

The conclusion I’ve come to is that it’s certainly a possibility.

————————————————————————————————–

References:
1. http://www.world-mysteries.com/doug_titanic1.htm
2. http://www.titanic-whitestarships.com/Owners2.htm
3. http://www.rense.com/general70/goodc.htm
4. http://www.logoi.com/notes/titanic/women_children_first.html
5. http://www.pacinst.com/terrorists/chapter5/titanic.html
6. http://www.museumstuff.com/learn/topics/Jesuit_conspiracy_theories::sub::The_Sinking_Of_The_Titanic
7. http://www.historyonthenet.com/Titanic/blame.htm
8. http://hubpages.com/hub/The_Titanic_Historical_Society
9. http://www.reformation.org/nikola-tesla.html
10. Begich & Manning, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” p. 12-13
11. O’Neil, “Prodigal Genius” p. 175
12. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic

Lies the media told me: The truth about the Trayvon martin case

infowarswilton — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:23:54 +0000

“First we got no photos of him, while the meme of “racist white man (source of all evil on earth) shoots innocent black teen for no reason at all” was driven into our heads. Then, when the first, now obviously photo-shopped, picture appeared, it was “racist white Hispanic (half evil) kills innocent black teen for no reason at all.” But whatever happened that night, the obviously intelligent Zimmerman is probably doomed to be found guilty in a Soviet-style show trial, and murdered in a race-riven prison, to advance the racial divide-and-conquer strategy of the regime. That was inevitable, as soon as the Kenyan-American called for it, against the Peruvian-American.”~Lew Rockwell (posted on facebook)

[D-CT] Senate Primary debate: Lee Whitnum calls opponent Chris Murphy “whore” for AIPAC, Israel lobby.

infowarswilton — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:15:06 +0000

She’s got my vote!

Lee Whitnum accused Incumbent Chris Murphy and other senate candidates of being deeply entrenched with the influential and powerful Israel lobby. More over Whitnum addressed Murphy as “whore, here…” and said that he had sold his soul to AIPAC; the heart of the Israeli lobby. ***standing ovation***

Many media outlets ran to the defense of Murphy and crucified Lee Whitnum over the comments. This is standard treatment for anyone who dares question the extraordinary influence that the Israeli government holds over the Congress and President. The reality is that the American foreign policy, the 5 major news networks, and American foreign aid levels must keep kosher by whatever standards The current Israeli leadership determines.

Quite frankly, Israel has a questionable history of loyalty to The United States. I don’t believe the Israeli government has in fact ever been an ally of the U.S. I speculate that Israel has been involved, not only, in the bombing of the U.S.S Liberty, but also, the assassination of John Kennedy and the world trade center bombings in both 1993 and 2001. My SHOCKING opinion aside, every American should be critical of any foreign nation with which so many members of congress and presidents are joined at the hip. Considering the trillions of tax dollars and millions of innocent civilians the USA and Israel have thrown by the wayside, we ought to act and view the relationship objectively.

Media [Over]Reaction:

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/04/06/3092583/candidate-calls-rival-whore-for-aipac
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/politics/Democratic-Senate-Candidates-Debate-Tonight-146288245.html
http://www.greenwich-post.com/online/daily-featured/local-news/100066-whitnum-calls-names-points-blame-at-aipac.html
http://www.timesofisrael.com/candidate-calls-rival-whore-for-aipac/
http://greenwich.patch.com/articles/malloy-says-whitnum-should-not-be-allowed-to-debate